Greg Walling

Atlanta attorney specializing in commercial real estate law; wills, trusts & probate; corporate & business law; and litigation


Prenuptial Agreements

A Prenuptial Agreement is a contract made in anticipation of marriage and can resolve many of the financial issues surrounding the parties (the two spouses) in the event of divorce and death. A Prenuptial Agreement cannot resolve child custody issues or the amount of child support, which would be decided by a divorce court.

Prenuptial Agreements can give one or both of the parties ease of mind in entering into a marriage. Even with a Prenuptial Agreement, the parties are free to make arrangements to the other party which are more generous than provided in the Prenuptial Agreement or can make bequests in a Will which are greater than that provided in a Prenuptial Agreement.

The Prenuptial Agreement can be of vital importance for mature couples who have previously been married with minor or adult children of a prior marriage to whom they wish to leave the bulk of their property. The existence of a Prenuptial Agreement can also allow these adult children to be much more welcoming to a new step-parent, knowing that there is a valid Prenuptial Agreement in place which provides for them notwithstanding the subsequent marriage of their parent.

In negotiating the terms of the Prenuptial Agreement, it is important for the parties to directly address together what each party is to receive in the event of divorce and death.

Prenuptial Agreements can be enforceable in Georgia. In determining whether a Prenuptial Agreement is enforceable in a particular case, the court will employ 3 criteria:

(1) Was the Prenuptial Agreement obtained through fraud, duress or mistake, or through misrepresentation or non-disclosure of material facts?

(2) Is the Prenuptial Agreement unconscionable?

(3) Have the facts or circumstances changed since the Prenuptial Agreement was signed, so as to make its enforceablilty unfair and unreasonable?

The leading case in Georgia determining that Prenuptial Agreements can be enforceable in Georgia is Scherer v. Scherer, 249 Ga. 635, 292 S.E.2d 662 (1982).

A Prenuptial Agreement should contain a full and fair disclosure of all material facts and each party’s property, assets, and income as exhibits. Each party to a Prenuptial Agreement should have his or her own attorney. It is not uncommon for the party having the greater assets to pay for the other party’s attorney.

Leave a comment

Caution on Employees Signing Non-Competition Agreements

I have seen many employees, especially young people, having problems or losing sleep after they sign non-competition agreements while accepting a job offer. The problem is especially acute among young adults, who are glad to receive a job offer but do not pay close enough attention to what they are signing. Many are signing their rights away. Some mention their concerns to their new employer, who replies not to be worried about it since the employer does not enforce those non-competition provisions anyway (which is not a satisfactory answer).

When presented with a non-competition agreement, keep in mind that these agreements have severe consequences to your rights in the future and can potentially cause major problems if not properly negotiated. Accordingly, when asked to sign an agreement with non-competition provisions in it, be sure and consult an attorney before signing it.

When I review such agreements for employees after they have been presented with the agreement from a new employer, I am generally successful in having the non-competition agreement stricken and instead replaced with the employee agreeing not to solicit certain customers of the new employer for a reasonable period of time (such a restriction if properly limited can be reasonable, as opposed to a non-competition agreement which in some circumstances can be unreasonable). Non-competition provisions, for example, can be reasonable if the employer agrees to pay a severance to the employee equal to the amount of time he or she is unable to work in his or her preferred line of work while he or she waits for a non-competition restriction to end.

Some employees find that they will be working in a different line of business, but most commonly it is the same or a similar business and a non-competition agreement can adversely impact their right to earn a living in the field of his or her choice.

This is an issue I have seen time and time again. Georgia law in the last few years has been changed to allow greater enforcement of non-competition agreements.

Accordingly, it is imperative when presented with such a non-competition agreement not to sign it, and consult an attorney to help negotiate it to something that is more reasonable such as a narrowly-drawn non-solicitation provision. Often, when the new employer is presented with the concerns of a new employee, the non-competition restrictions may be deleted (or replaced with a less restrictive and more reasonable non-solicitation restriction). The employer usually appreciates the concerns of the new employee.

Leave a comment

Caution on the Use of Images, Photos & Graphics on your Company’s Website

Be sure you have the right to use images, photos, graphics and other materials on your company’s website. Even if you hire a third party developer to design your website, you are still liable for copyright infringement if you in fact do not have the right to use images, photos, graphics and other information in your company’s website. There are a number of stock photo companies which, for a fee, grant a license for you to use the stock images, photos and graphics.

There is a company called Getty Images which buys and owns a large amount of the images, photos and graphics which are seen on the Internet. It is my understanding that Getty Images has sophisticated software which scans the Internet, and has the capability of locating websites which use images, photos and graphics that do not have licensed rights to do so. Getty Images then sends threatening demand letters, asking for a substantial sum of money for each image, photo and graphic used in order not to sue for copyright infringement. Accordingly, in reviewing your company’s website, be sure to have license or other rights (or use your own material) to use the images, photos and graphics displayed there. If you use a third-party to develop your website, be sure to stress the importance of using images, photos and graphics where you have a legal right to use them. It is possible to obtain an indemnification agreement from the third party website developer, indemnifying you or your company if images, photos and graphics are used without the right to do so (although indemnification is only as good as the third party website developer is able to reimburse you).

© Walling Law Firm, P.C. 2014

Leave a comment

Choosing and Protecting Your Company’s Name

When selecting a company’s name, be sure it does not infringe on someone else’s right to use a same or similar name. Just because the Secretary of State allows you to use a name, it does not necessarily mean that you have a legal right to use that name under U.S. copyright and other laws. Also, it does not give you exclusive rights to use that name.

If it is of large concern, there are companies which can perform a nationwide name search for you. An example of when this could be necessary is if you are about to spend substantial sums on advertising. For example, you don’t want to put your company’s name and logo on products if someone down the road may challenge your right to use that name or logo.

At the start-up of a company, owners often are not so much concerned about protecting the company’s name and are more concerned about day-to-day operations. After a time, as the company develops goodwill, a company’s name can become quite valuable and is, if nothing is done, largely unprotected.

It can be wise to have filed an application to register your company’s name as a trademark or servicemark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office (a trademark is for the sale of goods and a servicemark is for the sale of services). Once a company’s name is registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office, generally someone else may not use that name or a confusingly similar name for the sale of the same or similar goods or services. If not done fairly early-on, by the time an application to register a trademark is filed, some companies unfortunately find that someone else has already registered their company’s name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

You can avoid these problems, including possible usurpation of your company’s name by others, by at any early date filing with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office an application to register your company’s name (but not before the name is actually used in interstate commerce). Having a company’s name registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office can add substantial value to the company if the company or its assets are sold. Although the filing of an application to register a trademark furnishes some immediate protection, the process takes close to a year before the trademark registration is issued. Usually, there are no objections to an application to register a trademark. It is not typical, but occasionally there can be an objection by another entity claiming it is using the same or similar name for the sale of similar goods or services, which can result in trademark litigation.

© Walling Law Firm, P.C. 2014

Leave a comment

Importance of Buy-Sell Agreements

Whenever a company, corporation, or a limited liability has more than one owner (unless the owners are married), a buy-sell agreement can be of critical importance.

When a person goes into business with another person, typically they do not want the risk of being in business in the future with some unknown person. Without a buy-sell agreement, things can occur which cause a business owner’s interest in a company to go to another person. This can happen by a voluntary sale or gift, death, divorce, or an involuntary transfer to creditors or a bankruptcy trustee.

For example, without a buy-sell agreement: (1) If a co-owner dies, the deceased co-owner’s estate or family members will then own the deceased co-owner’s interest in the business (unless the deceased co-owner’s valid Will states otherwise); (2) If a co-owner becomes involved in a divorce, then his or her spouse can potentially make a claim to his or her interest in the business; (3) If a co-owner has creditors (whether by contract or in tort, such as a bad car accident), and a creditor obtains a judgment against the co-owner or his or her estate, then the judgment attaches to the co-owner’s interest in the business, and the creditor can levy on it and become a co-owner of the business (and hold it hostage); (4) If a co-owner files bankruptcy, then without a buy-sell agreement a bankruptcy trustee may make a claim to the bankrupt co-owner’s interest in the business and sell it to a third person (or hold it hostage). In all of these situations, without the presence of a buy-sell agreement, then a co-owner may find himself or herself in business with a total stranger.

In the event of death by a co-owner, without a buy-sell agreement the other co-owners do not know what to do as to the deceased co-owner’s estate or family, and the deceased co-owner’s estate or family does not know what to do as to the business. Depending on the deceased co-owner’s percentage interest in the business, this can adversely (and disastrously) affect the continued operation of the business, and, regardless of the percentage interest of the deceased co-owner, can result in time-consuming and costly litigation among the surviving co-owners and the deceased co-owner’s estate or family. A buy-sell agreement can avoid these situations and provide a road map for the surviving co-owner to have an option to buy out a deceased co-owner’s interest in the business from the deceased owner’s estate or family.

Typical provisions in a buy-sell agreement provide that a co-owner may not sell his or her interest in the company, without first giving a right of first refusal to the company and the other co-owners. This prevents a co-owner from selling or giving his or her interest in the business to a third person. A typical buy-sell agreement also provides what happens in the event of death of a co-owner. A buy-sell agreement can provide that the other co-owners or the company may have a discretionary option (or it can be a requirement) to purchase the deceased co-owner’s interest in the business from the deceased co-owner’s estate. A buy-sell agreement can provide that the purchase price of the deceased co-owner’s interest in the company is to be at “fair value,” leaving the determination of “fair value” for a later date should it become necessary. Alternatively, a buy-sell agreement can provide a mechanism, such as an appraisal process or formula, for determination of fair value, arbitration, or provide a set dollar amount (an issue with a set dollar amount is that the fair value of the business will undoubtedly change over time).

A buy-sell agreement can provide that if the surviving co-owner exercises his or her discretionary option to buy out the deceased co-owner’s interest from the deceased co-owner’s estate, then the purchase price of the deceased co-owner’s interest in the company is paid by, for example, 20% cash down, and the balance financed, for example, at the Wall Street Journal’s prime rate plus 2%, amortized over a period of 3 years and payable in equal, successive monthly or quarterly installments (the terms can be adjusted in the buy-sell agreement to whatever terms work for the co-owners). This payment obligation is documented by a Promissory Note and secured against the deceased co-owner’s interest in the company, so that if the business fails to make the required payments, the deceased co-owner’s estate can get back the deceased co-owner’s interest in the business back. This same arrangement in a buy-sell agreement can be made applicable in the event of divorce, involuntary transfer (creditors), or bankruptcy of a co-owner.

Even with a buy-sell agreement, often a surviving co-owner and a deceased co-owner’s family will mutually agree to some other arrangement for the surviving co-owner to buy out the deceased co-owner’s interest in the company, with the buy-sell agreement serving as a general road map for the parties to follow and expressing the intention of the co-owners of a company of what is to happen if one of the co-owners dies.

Ideally, a buy-sell agreement will be backed up by life insurance so that the surviving co-owner or the company has the funds to pay to a deceased co-owner’s estate or family in order for the surviving co-owner or the company to buy out the deceased co-owner’s interest in the company (negating the necessity of a promissory note and security). However, many business owners, especially at start-up, find that life insurance is prohibitively expensive.

With or without life insurance, a buy-sell agreement is critical in situations where there is more than one owner of a company.

Other provisions which can be included in a buy-sell agreement are tag along rights (allowing a minority owner to tag along with the majority owners if the majority owners decide to sell their interest in the company to a third party buyer), come along rights (allowing the majority owners to require minority owners to also sell their interest in the company to a bona fide third-party buyer, if the majority owners are also selling their interest to the third-party buyer), put and call provisions, a company option to buy-out a co-owner’s interest in the company if the co-owner is terminated from employment by the company or becomes disabled, voting agreements, and the like. The terms of a buy-sell agreement can be tailored to whatever terms fit the needs and situation of the co-owners.

In setting up a company, many multiple owners do not know whether the company will survive and make it past the first year, and are often cashed-strapped and therefore avoid the expense of a buy-sell agreement. Buy-Sell provisions can usually fairly easily be incorporated into a limited liability company’s operating agreement. If a corporation, buy-sell provisions are included in a separate shareholders’ agreement. Once a company gets off the ground, a buy-sell agreement is of vital importance.

© 2014 Walling Law Firm, P.C.

Leave a comment

Why Have An Employee Handbook?

An issue that I see time and time again is businesses which do not have an Employee Handbook.  An Employee Handbook covers a range of rules and policies of the business, which are impossible to cover in a written Employment Agreement.  If a business has an Employee Handbook, and if an employee violates a rule or policy in the Employee Handbook, then the business can take disciplinary action and reduce the risk that the business may be liable for charges of unlawful employment discrimination. Without an Employee Handbook in place, a disciplined employee can more forcefully argue that he or she has been discriminated on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, physical disability, or age, since the business does not have a written policy in place. Without an Employee Handbook, a disciplined employee is more likely to feel that he or she has been treated unfairly.

Matters covered by an Employee Handbook are often conduct-related, such as off-duty conduct which damages the business’ reputation, workplace violence (banning the bringing of knives and weapons to the workplace), outside employment such as moonlighting, moonlighting for a competitor, using company email for political or non-business purposes, on-line conduct at the workplace, acceptance of gifts or money from customers, use of company property for personal business or personal reasons, attendance, use of inappropriate or profane language, alcohol, drugs, bad hygiene, sleeping on the job, and the many other issues which arise from time to time whenever there is a gathering of two or more people.

Having policies in an Employee Handbook allows the business to take disciplinary action when there has been a violation of those policies. A business will often learn of an issue with an employee by way of complaints from other employees, and a business needs to have the tools necessary to discipline an offending employee. Of course, policies in an Employee Handbook should be enforced by the business in a non-discriminatory manner.

A business will want to be certain that the Employee Handbook itself is not an employment agreement, and should specify that employment is at will unless otherwise agreed to in writing. An Employee Handbook has many legal implications, and it should first be reviewed by an attorney. Attorneys who practice in this area have templates which provide the bulk of the provisions for an Employee Handbook. An Employee Handbook is recommended for businesses of all sizes.

Leave a comment

New 3.8% Medicare Tax

Section 1402 of the Healthcare and Reconciliation Act of 2010 which amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act provides for a new unearned income Medicare tax of 3.8% and goes into effect January 1, 2013.  This new 3.8% Medicare tax is codified at 26 United States Code Sec. 1411.

Taxpayers with Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) over $200,000 filing individually or $250,000 for married couples filing jointly could be subject to the tax if the taxpayer has unearned income. The tax is a 3.8% Medicare tax on “unearned” taxable income of interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents which are not derived in the ordinary course of trade or business, excluding S corporation or partnership income. If, for example, capital gains on a primary home sale exceed $250,000 for individuals or $500,000 for a married couple, and the income threshold is met, the excess realized gain is subject to the 3.8% Medicare tax.

There are special rules for estates and trusts.

The new Medicare tax is not imposed on the total adjusted income nor is it imposed solely on the investment income.  Rather, the taxable amount depends on the results of a formula. The taxpayer will determine the lesser of (1) net investment income, or (2) the excess AGI over the $200,000/$250,000 AGI threshold. If net investment income is the lesser amount, then the 3.8% tax is applied only to the net investment income amount. If the excess over the threshold is the smaller amount, then the 3.8% tax would apply only to the excess amount.

A good and more detailed discussion of the new 3.8% Medicare tax is by the Congressional Healthcare Caucus.  The tax is complicated, and if you think it may or will apply, you should seek professional tax advice from a certified public accountant.

Leave a comment

Independent Contractor Vs. Employee – A Common Business Problem

A common business problem I come across are companies which hire workers as independent contractors and not as employees.  Many of these companies have no signed written independent contractor agreement stipulating that the worker is an independent contractor and not an employee.  Even with a signed written independent contractor agreement in place, despite what the agreement says, unless a number of factors are satisfied the worker may nevertheless be classified as an employee and not as an independent contractor.

These factors vary according to state and federal laws, but the IRS has a list of factors here as a starting place.  The IRS factors are:

1.  Behaviorial Control (are instructions given to the worker as to when, where, and how to do the work;  what tools or equipment to use; what other workers can assist with the work; where to purchase supplies; and the order or sequence of the work).  The more behavorial instructions which are given, the greater likelihood that the worker is an employee;

2.  Financial Control (does the worker have his or her own significant investment in the equipment used to perform the job; is there an opportunity for the worker to lose money on the job; is the worker free to also work for other companies; and is the method of payment akin to an employee or an independent contractor); and

3.  Type of Relationship (is there a written agreement; are there employee benefits; is the relationship for a particular task or is it permanent; are the services provided a key activity of the business).

The determination of whether a person is an independent contractor or employee is fact sensitive.  If a company or a worker is uncertain if a worker is an independent contractor or employee based on the IRS factors, that person can complete and submit IRS Form SS-8, and the IRS at no charge will make the determination for purposes of federal employment taxes and income tax withholding.

Georgia’s Employment Security Law provides that services performed by an individual for wages are deemed to be employment (and not an independent contractor arrangement) unless and until it is shown that (1)(A) such individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of such services, both under the individual’s contract of service and in fact; and (B) such individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business; or (2) such individual and the services performed for wages are the subject of an SS-8 determination by the IRS, which decided against employee status.  O.C.G.A. Sec. 33-8-35(f).

Whether a worker is an independent contractor or is in fact an employee (even with a written independent contractor agreement in place) has significant consequences to the company as to liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, withholding requirements, FICA and Medicare, health insurance and other benefits, and the possible application of a host of federal and state laws.  From the company’s perspective, sometimes the worst place to be is to for the issue to be unclear and in a gray area.  This can result in litigated claims against the company by the worker, possible liability to third parties (for torts and wrongs committed by the worker while working for the company), company-wide audits by state and federal agencies, and many other issues.

Companies should also consider that independent contractors by the independent nature of their duty may often set their own hours and work for other companies, including competitors.  Even if a worker can properly be classified as an independent contractor, if the worker is hired as an employee with the company, then the employee will owe a duty of loyalty and care to the company, and the company can exert greater restrictions on the employee, such as restricting the employee (in a written employment agreement)  from working for a competitor while also working for the company.

Companies should consult with their accountant or attorney as to whether a worker is in fact an independent contractor or employee.  If a worker may be properly classified as an independent contractor, a written independent contractor agreement should be drafted, prepared and signed.  Even if a worker may be classified as an independent contractor, it sometimes may be better practice nevertheless to classify the worker as an employee so the company may exert greater control over the worker.

Greg B. Walling, Walling Law Firm, P.C., 8300 Dunwoody Pl., Suite 200, Atlanta, Ga. 30350; tele. 770-349-8215; email


Leave a comment

Review your Insurance Policies – A Common Problem

A common problem I see that happens over and over is a client who thinks that insurance covers something that really isn’t covered.  It is amazing how either insurance agents when insurance is purchased verbally lead people to believing that something is covered, the policy has changed over the years so that a matter is no longer covered, there is a misunderstanding, or the client is simply mistaken.

Often it seems when a client asks the insurance agent if something is covered, the insurance agent says “yes, yes, yes, it is covered.”  When there is a claim, the insurance agent responds, “Oh, that is not covered.”

It is costly when clients believe that a matter is covered by insurance and only find out when something goes wrong that it is not covered.  If there is no insurance coverage, the insured (client) may have to hire and pay for its own attorney while the insurance company will provide and pay for an attorney if a matter is covered by insurance.   The duty to defend is a major benefit of insurance.  Most importantly, without insurance coverage a client may be liable for damages for which it thought it had insurance. 

Carefully review or have your attorney review your insurance policies from time to time, preferably annually.  You may find that you do not have a full and current copy of an insurance policy.  The insurance policy may have been slowly amended over the years by the insurance company.  A “declaration page” is only a one or two page summary and is not the full policy.  If you do not or no longer have a full copy of the current policy, contact your insurance agent and they will mail or email you one.  If you review your own policies, be sure and pay particular and careful attention to the part labeled exclusions.  Insurance policies are notoriously difficult documents to read.

If a matter is excluded for which you need insurance, if you notice it before something goes wrong, often your insurance agent can provide a rider or endorsement which insures the matter for an additional (and quite often nominal) premium.

Greg B. Walling, Walling Law Firm, P.C., 8300 Dunwoody Pl., Suite 200, Atlanta, Ga. 30350; tele. 770-349-8215; email


Leave a comment